Indeed, coincidental to the post just prior to this, I suggested that a philosophy is not complete until we’ve considered what was left out, or, when we have a philosophy of what it is excluding.
And Harman’s lecture inItaly is posted and I watch it and he begins with his initial statements of why there is a necessary excess.
What about access?
The interesting thing about Harman, and I think one of the things that bothers people about his OOP, is that he enacts an access into this excess that he posits by induction. (Is it induction ?) For I think the real and significant question would be: how it is possible to have an excess that is accessible and what does this mean?