addendum to what I said about Husserl in the previous post

I dunno, but this sounds strangely  familiar . (Real/not real ???). 
REPOST: 

In the previous post I stressed the rift in Husserl between intentional objects and their sensuous qualities, without which phenomenology could never get off the ground, and a feature that is probably Husserl’s biggest selling point. The reason Husserlians don’t see the novelty of this insight is that they continue to convince themselves that Husserl […]

https://doctorzamalek2.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/addendum-to-what-i-said-about-husserl-in-the-previous-post/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s